Tell Me Close Your Thought-Process, Non Merely Your Results

While at that spot is a lot of speak virtually the utilisation of schools on "teaching to think", the reality is far from that ideal. Explaining/exploring/practicing human-thought-process is ignored (and sometimes actively-shunned) inward undergraduate together with graduate score teaching. This hurts students a lot. Bad memories virtually my commencement networking course of pedagogy lurk every bit I write. The textbook opened past times describing the format of TCP together with UDP packets inward all their gory details earlier introducing whatever of the TCP or UDP protocol ideas or fifty-fifty the basic networking concepts/problems. The teacher followed the textbook blankly together with used the powerpoint slides that came amongst the textbook, which evidently did non target a human audience. We were simply asked to memorize (learn?) together with non to intend or question. I actually hated the class, together with likewise the networking expanse every bit a result. Luckily, my dislike of networking was cured eventually (thanks to the "Elements of Networking Protocols" together with "Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach Featuring the Internet").

Why is this the instance inward teaching? I intend a big business office of the respond is laziness. Most instructors are lazy (unmotivated, ill-equipped), hence they follow the textbooks. Most textbook writers are likewise lazy, hence they follow the mode of technical papers on the subject, which are non student/learner-friendly. Then the inquiry is "Why are the technical papers written that way?". I guess business office of the argue is the pretense to appear to a greater extent than formal. This may every bit good go dorsum to the Bourbaki mode of mathematics. Freeman Dyson has this to tell virtually the topic on his "Birds together with Frogs" article:

"[The Bourbaki project] changed the mode of mathematics for the adjacent l years, imposing a logical coherence that did non be before, together with moving the emphasis from concrete examples to abstract generalities. In the Bourbaki scheme of things, mathematics is the abstract construction included inward the Bourbaki textbooks. What is non inward the textbooks is non mathematics. Concrete examples, since they create non appear inward the textbooks, are non mathematics. The Bourbaki programme was the extreme appear of the Cartesian style. It narrowed the ambit of mathematics past times excluding the beautiful flowers that Baconian travelers mightiness collect past times the wayside."

The goals of introducing generality together with rigor inward the Bourbaki procedure are non bad but that should non (and does not) imply shunning the presentation of the thought-processes that led to these results. Our task is to communicate to other humans together with the goal of formalizing things should hold upward to brand things easier to grasp for humans non to obfuscate them.

I receive got my suspicions that approximately other business office of the argue to shun presenting thought-processes inward publications is to comprehend upward the tracks of our "lacking" thought-processes together with pose upward a macho human face upward past times simply presenting our "seemingly perfect" end-results. "- It was difficult for me to figure this out, hence it should likewise hold upward difficult for the reader to understand." That sounds ridiculous, but I receive got witnessed similar conversations inward a twain of my collaborations when I pleaded to simplify the presentation past times explaining our thought-process. In general, theory papers are to a greater extent than prone to commit this sin, together with systems papers (good ones) are to a greater extent than thought-process friendly. Unfortunately, most conferences/journals value complexity (rather than simplicity) every bit a sign of technical depth, together with this takes the incentive of explaining the thought-processes behind your work, which mightiness homecoming it every bit obvious/simplistic.

We all receive got humble brains; don't permit anybody seat y'all differently. Falling brusk of superpowers (genius/giftedness), nosotros invent processes/systems to succeed, together with the skilful matter virtually these processes are they are replicable (unlike existence genius/gifted). This is why I struggle that explaining thought-processes are really important. The novelist Haruki Murakami comes to take away heed here. On his mass "What I Talk About When I Talk About Running", he says roughly the following. Gifted writers write without effort; everywhere they comport upon inward the solid set down the H2O pours. Other writers receive got to strive (he gives himself every bit an example); they receive got to acquire to dig wells to acquire to the water. But when the H2O dries (inspiration leaves) for the gifted author (which happens sooner or later), he becomes stuck together with clueless because he has non trained for this. On the other hand, nether the same situation, the other type of author knows how to go on going together with succeed. This is the argue nosotros should learn our students/audience how to dig wells, together with non to rely on occasional smasher of insights for success.

Explaining your thought-processes is likewise non bad for improving the presentation/exposition of your results. Humans dear stories. (I dare y'all non to acquire addicted to "This American Life") Tell us stories, together with nosotros pay attending together with holler back them. In my classes (and likewise inward my papers) I seat stories to give the context together with motivation for a problem. I permit the tension construct tardily until I tin give notice experience the audience getting excited or troubled amongst the problem. Then, I speak virtually strawmen solutions (in the course of pedagogy I encourage the students to come upward up amongst these strawmen solutions themselves), together with hash out how these autumn brusk of solving the problem. Then it is fourth dimension for me to innovate the novel gleam of insight into the problem, together with how the solution follows from that. In short, I examine to communicate to beau humans amongst humble brains together with limited attention-spans similar me.

PS: My skilful friend together with colleague Ted Herman has emailed me a link to this beautiful poem after reading the draft of this post which was together with hence titled "Tell me virtually the journey, non simply the destination".

Share this post