How To Write Papers Together With Thus They Become Accepted

This is a really bold together with *valuable* talk: The arts and crafts of writing effectively. It introduces a no-bullshit approach to academic publishing that volition change/upgrade your perspective to writing. This speak may scandalise you, you lot may desire to turn down these ideas initially, but you lot volition eventually realize that this is the reality nosotros alive inward together with you lot must come upward to damage alongside it.

1. Since you lot are a researcher, together with bargain alongside complicated topics, you lot postulate to occupation your writing for thinking. Writing together with thinking feed off of each other, together with you lot postulate to write to assistance your thinking. But ultimately writing is non almost you lot or your thinking, it is almost the *reader*. After your initial drafts are done, you lot should reframe your writing to travel reader-centric. The reader doesn't attention almost your work, he cares almost what useful things he tin give the sack larn from it. (In marketing, they own got a practiced maxim almost this: The client doesn't desire a might drill, he wants a hole inward the wall to hang a photo.)
2. Provide value to your readers. The value of a newspaper does non come upward from beingness novel or original. A piece of work tin give the sack travel novel or master but withal non render whatever value, if the readers didn't attention almost the problem. A certainly agency to render value is to exhibit that your piece of work changes the condition quo: the community was incorrect almost a certainly thing, together with your newspaper gets things right. (There are polite ways to state "you were all wrong" together with if "wrong" is a rigid word, you lot may run into this equally the "surprise" cistron inward Winston's star.) 
3. The component division of academic writing is NOT to communicate your ideas, but to alter the ideas of an existing community. The readers should travel able to gain a novel agreement of the Blue Planet through the lens of your writing. Thus, your writing should struggle why it is valuable. Its destination should travel to persuade non merely explain. 
4. Know your readers. You can't delight dissimilar type of readers at once. Even nether the same field, dissimilar communities own got widely dissimilar taste. This is component division of the argue why a PhD takes 5+ years: you lot larn almost your community together with the "code words" that are precious to your community. Identify the people that own got power, together with give them what they want. (The speaker says tongue-in-cheek that this is why University of Chicago writing programme is deemed fascist past times some.) 
5. The writing should travel structured equally job together with solution. The job should travel motivated past times showing that at that spot is an instability (the community is incorrect on this), together with that past times resolving this instability nosotros avoid certainly costs together with acquire certainly benefits. The literature review should travel used for enriching the problem. 

You may acquire offended alongside the brash together with contentious opinions inward special 4, but the diagnosis is non wrong. The quicker you lot upgrade your perspective on writing to represent this approach, the easier it volition acquire for your papers to travel accepted.

As for special 4, I mean value this is the unromantic reality: In academic publishing, you lot should speak truth to the power, but solely those truths that the might is interested inward hearing about, together with solely inward a manner they endorse. 

I own got seen people artificially brand their papers to a greater extent than formal together with abstruse because that is how you lot print the PC of some theory conferences. This is horrible equally it makes the papers less accessible, but these are the types of papers that acquire accepted inward those communities. The systems community is non blameless either. Valuing algorithmic contributions to a greater extent than than extensive evaluation together with application volition probable kill your submission. Some communities aspect together with enforce a "style" then rigid that, fifty-fifty alongside double-blind reviewing it is non possible to play a trick on reviewers to mean value you lot are alongside the "in-crowd". In elitist conferences, you lot postulate to dot your value/style fifty-fifty through your references. If a piece of work appeared inward a lesser conference, at that spot is no postulate to select it upward inward related piece of work discussion.

Not all elements of "style" together with feel of "community" is bad. Style serves a useful function. Formalism is of import for precision. Formal proofs are of import to avoid sloppiness together with hand-waving. Evaluations continue authors honest. But manner tin give the sack equally good travel used enforced inward excessiveness, together with that is harmful.

This feel of community together with manner tin give the sack travel then rigid that nosotros own got a maxim for it inward academia. The same course of pedagogy taught past times 2 dissimilar instructors could travel to a greater extent than dissimilar than 2 dissimilar courses taught past times the same instructor.

Some of my selected posts on writing:

• How I write
• How to write your question paper
• How to nowadays your work
• Writing advice

Share this post